References

Anderson vs. Celebrezze. 1983. 460 US 780. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Appleman, Eric M. 2000. The Rest of the Primaries. Internet. Available from http://www.gwu.edu/~action/chrnothp.html; accessed 24 December 2002.

Brock, William E. 2000. Nominating future presidents. Report of the Advisory Commission on the Presidential Nominating Process. Internet. Available from http://www.rnc.org/media/pdfs/brockreport.pdf; accessed 13 February 2003.

Broder, David S. 2000. GOP begins difficult overhaul of primaries. The Washington Post, May 12.

Buckley vs. Valeo. 1976. 424 US 1. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Burroughs vs. US. 1934. 290 US 545. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Bush vs. Gore. 2000. 531 US 98. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

California Voter Foundation. 2002. California congressional district map. Internet. Available from http://www.calvoter.org/maps; accessed 13 March 2003.

Center for Governmental Studies. 2001. Report of the National Symposium on Presidential Selection. Internet. Available from http://www.centerforpolitics.org/reform/nssreport_entire.pdf; accessed 4 January 2003.

Clements vs. Flashing. 1982. 457 US 957. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Clymer, Adam. 2000. G.O.P. panel sets vote on revising primaries, New York Times, May 12.

CNN.com. 2002. Democrats move up 2004 primary schedule, 19 January. Internet. Available from http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/19/democrats.primary/; accessed 23 December 2002.

Congressional Quarterly. 1960a. How delegates to national conventions are chosen. 12 February, 225.

-----. 1960b. Sixteen presidential primaries scheduled for 1960. 4 March, 348.

-----. 1964. Results of the 17 presidential primaries in 1964. 12 June, 1122-1124.

-----. 1968a. Democratic presidential primaries. 14 June, 1480.

-----. 1968b. Republican presidential primaries. 14 June, 1481.

-----. 1968c. GOP delegates: one-fifth ’64 returnees, few negroes. 26 July, 1978-2000.

-----. 1968d. Republican presidential primaries. 16 August, 2147.

-----. 1968e. Credential challenges set record at convention. 23 August, 2245-2254.

-----. 1972. Presidential primaries: Proposals for a new system. 8 July, 1650-1654.

-----. 1976a. Carter coasts to nomination in 30 primaries. 10 July, 1806-1807.

-----. 1976b. Caucuses: light turnout, many uncommitted. 10 July, 1809-1811.

-----. 1976c. A quick ‘who’s who’ of GOP delegations. 14 August, 2188- 2196.

-----. 1980a. Results of the long 1980 season... presidential primary elections. 5 July, 1870-1871.

-----. 1980b. A quick look at the Republican delegations. 12 July, 1928-1937.

-----. 1980c. Democratic presidential caucus results. 26 July, 2126.

-----. 1980d. A ‘who’s who’ of Democratic delegations. 9 August, 2268-2276.

-----. 1984a. First-round results of Democratic caucuses. 2 June, 1317

-----. 1984b. Presidential primary vote summary. 16 June, 1443.

-----. 1988a. Opening round primaries and caucuses... fragmented electorate. 5 March, 570-571.

-----. 1988b. Presidential primary/caucus calendar. 5 March, 574.

-----. 1988c. 1988 Democratic primary results. 9 July, 1894.

-----. 1988d. 1988 Democratic first-round caucus results. 9 July, 1895.

-----. 1988e. 1988 Republican primary results. 9 July, 1896.

-----. 1988f. 1988 Republican first-round caucus results. 9 July, 1897.

-----. 1992a. Primary turnout. 28 March, 823.

-----. 1992b. Clinton left behind in caucuses. 4 Apr, 899.

-----. 1992c. Remaining primaries, caucuses. 11 Apr, 967.

-----. 1992d. Remaining primaries, caucuses. 2 May, 1188.

-----. 1996. 1996 presidential primary... and caucus calendar. 13 January, 98-99.

Democratic National Committee. 2000. Beyond 2000: The scheduling of future democratic presidential primaries and caucuses. April 29.

Dunn vs. Blumstein. 1972. 405 US 330. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Elrod vs. Burns. 1976. 427 US 347. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Eu vs. San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee. 1989. 489 US 214. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Ex Parte Yarborough. 1884. 110 US 651. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Gangale, Thomas. 1999a. The National Primary System: A 21st century method for nominating Presidential candidates. Internet. Available from http://www.ops-alaska.com/ps/1999/; accessed 1 February 2003.

Gangale, Thomas. 1999b. Realign presidential primaries to dilute power of region, money. Philadelphia Inquirer, 13 April. Internet. Available from http://www.ops-alaska.com/ps/gang13.html; accessed 1 February 2003.

Gorton, Slade, and Joseph Lieberman. 1999. Regional presidential selection act of 1999. Internet. Available from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:s.1789:; accessed 8 April 2003.

Gorton, Slade. 2000. Testimony of Senator Slade Gorton (WA) before the Committee on Rules and Administration, United States Senate, March 29, 2000. Internet. Available from http://rules.senate.gov/hearings/2000/032900gorton.htm; accessed 25 January 2003.

Gray vs. Sanders. 1963. 372 US 368. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Hegarty, Paul. 2003. Executive Director, Arizona Democratic Party. Email message. January 21.

Hirsch, J.M. 2000. Smith releases plan to keep New Hampshire's primary first, 6 July. Internet. Available from http://smith.senate.gov/Releases/Releases/07062000.HTM; accessed 4 January 2003.

Illinois vs. Socialist Workers Party. 1979. 440 US 173. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Kendall, Kathleen E. 1998. Communication patterns in presidential primaries 1912-2000: Knowing the rules of the game. Harvard University. Internet. Available from http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/pdfs/R19.pdf; accessed 9 April 2003.

Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling. 2003. Richard A. Forsten. Biography. Internet. Available from http://www.klettrooney.com/attorneys/alpha/f/forstenra.html; accessed 13 February 2003.

Lester, Will. 2000. GOP abandons plan to overhaul primary schedule. Associated Press, July 28. Internet. Available from http://archive.nandotimes.com/election2000/story/0,3977,500233467-500339806-501946106-0-nandotimes,00.html; accessed 4 January 2003.

Levin, Sander. 2000. Interregional presidential primary and caucus act of 2000. Internet. Available from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:h.r.4014:; accessed 8 April 2003.

Lieberman, Joseph. 1999. Gorton, Lieberman call for presidential selection overhaul. Press release, 26 October. Internet. Available from http://www.senate.gov/member/ct/lieberman/general/r102699a.html; accessed 4 January 2003.

Lieberman, Joseph. 2000. Testimony on Regional Presidential Selection Act of 1999. Internet. Available from http://www.senate.gov/member/ct/lieberman/general/r032900a.html; accessed 25 January 2003.

Marlantes, Liz. 2002. Primary races - over in one day?. Christian Science Monitor, 18 January. Internet. Available from http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0118/p01s02-uspo.html; accessed 4 January 2003.

National Association of Secretaries of State. 2000. Presidential Primary Plan. Internet. Available from http://www.nass.org/issues.html; accessed 23 December 2002.

Oregon vs. Mitchell. 1970. 400 US 112. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Painter, Tom. 2000. National primary day. oped.com, 1 June. Internet. Available from http://www.oped.com/archives/archive-G11.html; accessed 4 January 2003.

Parshall, Lisa K., and Franco Mattei. 2002. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Patterson, Thomas E. 2000. Public involvement and the 2000 nominating campaign: Implications for electoral reform,” The Vanishing Voter Project, April 27. Internet. Available from http://www.vanishingvoter.org/releases/04-27-00prim-4.shtml; accessed 13 February 2003.

Project Vote Smart. 2003. State government facts and statistics. Internet. Available from http://www.vote-smart.org/mystate_government_statistics.php; accessed 5 September 2003.

Reynolds vs. Simms. 1964. 377 US 533. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Schneider vs. State. 1939. 308 US 147. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Schneider, Mary Beth. 2000. Meeting here, GOP panel is rethinking primary system. The Indianapolis Star, May 10.

Schram, Martin. 2000. There's got to be a better way. The Nando Times, March 15. Internet. Available from http://archive.nandotimes.com/election2000/story/0,3977,500180639-500238280-501180129-0-nandotimes,00.html; accessed 9 April 2003.

Smith vs. Allwright. 1944. 321 US 649. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Smith, Mike. 2000a. Republicans debate changes in primary schedule. CNN.com, May 12, 2000. Internet. Available from http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/05/12/primaries.gop.ap/; accessed 2 January 2003.

Smith, Robert. 2000. Senator Bob Smith’s ‘Fairness in primaries’ plan. Memorandum to the Republican National Committee Members and Delegates. Internet. Available from http://www.gwu.edu/~action/smithplan.htm; accessed 24 December 2002.

Stark, Leonard P. 1996. The presidential primary and caucus schedule: A role for federal regulation? 15 Yale Law and Policy Review, 331. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Timmons vs. Twin Cities Area New Party. 1997. 520 US 351. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

Udall, Morris K. 1981. A proposal for presidential primary reform. 10 New York University Review of Law and Social Change 19. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

US vs. Classic 1941. 313 US 299. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Internet. Available from http://www.census.gov/census2000/states/; accessed 5 February 2003.

Walsh, Susan. 2000. Primary reform clears GOP hurdle. CBSNews.com, 26 July. Internet. Available from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/07/27/politics/main219401.shtml; accessed 13 February 2003.

Lester, Will. 1999. Regional primary plan approved. Washington Post, 13 February. Internet. Available from http://www-wp7.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/primary021399.htm; accessed 10 December 2003.

Wesberry vs. Sanders. 1964. 376 US 1. Quoted in Lisa K. Parshall and Franco Mattei. Parties and the presidential nomination process: Political and constitutional implications of “front-loading.” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, November 7-9.